Comparative Analysis of Different Fertilizers Effects on Maize Growth Parameters

Authors

  • KWIZERA Chantal University of Burundi, Burandi
  • KABONEKA Salvator University of Burundi, Burandi
  • NDIHOKUBWAYO Soter University of Burundi, Burandi
  • HABONIMANA Bernadette University of Burundi, Burandi
  • NIJIMBERE Severin University of Burundi, Burandi
  • NSENGIYUMVA Prudence University of Burundi, Burandi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31695/IJASRE.2020.33862

Keywords:

Growth parameters, Maize crop, Composts, Maize Fertilizer

Abstract

Lower soil fertility was identified as a major problem affecting crop yield in Burundi, especially at Bihunge, a hill of Matongo commune Kayanza province. An experiment was therefore carried out with five treatments to assess the effective and economically affordable treatment on maze growth parameters improvement. The experimental has considered five treatments: the control (T1); Compost from maize residues + mineral adjuvant (T2); Compost from maize residues + organic adjuvant based on Calliandra calothyrsus Meisn (T3); ISABU formula for maize fertilization (T4); the maize compost + Calliandra + recommended mineral fertilization for maize (T5)), in randomized complete blocks with three replications for each. The recorded parameters were the leaves number, plant height, stem girth as well as the leaf area. After analysis with SPSS and Advanced Excel, results showed a significant difference between treatments. The treatment T4 was the most effective in improving all growth parameters than others and showed a significant difference from treatments T1, T2, and T3. However, it did not differ to treatment T5 which also significantly differed from other treatments with P<0.05.  Treatment T5 has also effectively enhanced the leaves number, plant height, stem girth, and leaf area as treatment T4, and was in the same variation range as this treatment T4. As the effectiveness of T5 was based on the combination of calliandra which has more potential in improving soil fertility and nutrient followed by better fostering of nutrients to the plant leading to better-improved plant growth, this treatment was considered as the effective and farmer accessible treatment for maize cultivation.

References

Sehgal, J. and Abrol, I.P., 1994. Soil Degradation in India: Status and Impact. Oxford & IBH, New Delhi.

http://www.isteebu.bi/images/rapports/projections%20provinciales%20%20%20reajustees.pdf3.pdf

http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/countries_regions/BDI/BDI-CP_fra.pdf

Krauss H. A., and R.R. Allmaras. Technology masks soil erosion effects on soil productivity—a case study in Whitman County, ~Yashington. In Detcr,ninants of Soil Loss Tolerance. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wise. 1981, volume 16 pp.61. doi:10.2134/asaspecpub45.c7

Martha Bakker M., Gerard Govers, A. Robert Jones and D.A. Mark Rounsevell. The Effect of Soil Erosion on Europe’s Crop Yields. ,Springer-Verlag, 2007 Volume 10, Issue 7, pp 1209–1219. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-007-9090-3

Jones A.J., R. Lal, and D. R. Huggins. Soil erosion and productivity research: A regional approach. Am J of Alter Agri, 1997. Vulume (12), pp.185-192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0889189300007554

Bossio D, Geheb K, Critchley (2010) Managing water by managing land: Addressing land degradation to improve water productivity and rural livelihoods. Agric Water manage 97: 536–542. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.12.001

Zougmoré R., A. Mando, Stroosnijder (2009) Soil Nutrient and Sediment Loss as Affected By Erosion Barriers and Nutrient Source in Semi-Arid Burkina Faso. Arid Land Research and Management23: 85–101. doi: 10.1080/15324980802599142

Zhang S., X. Zhang, X. Ruffman, X. Liu, J.Yang (2011) Influence of topography and land management on soil nutrient variability in Northeast China. Nutri Cycl Agroecosyst 89 (3): 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-010-9406-0

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Burundi Regional Refugee Response Plan, December 2018

Ambayeba Muimba-Kankolongo, 2018. Common Cultivation Practices. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/calliandra-calothyrsus

National Research Council (U.S.), Advisory Committee on Technology Innovations, Perhum Perhutani, Indonesia (1983): Calliandra, a Versatile Small Tree for the Humid Tropics (17.07.2020)

http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/publicat/gutt-shel/x5556e09.htm (17.11.2014)

Kaho, F. Yemefack, M. Yongue-Fouateu, R.Kanmegne, J. Bilong, P. . Potentials of Calliandra calothyrsus Meissner for improving soil fertility and maize performance in the forest savannah transition zone of Cameroon. Nigerian Journal of Soil and Environmental Research. 2007 page 33-44

Brewbaker, J.L., van der Beldt, R. and MacDicken, K., 1982. Nitrogen fixing tree resources: Potentials and limitations, in:

Graham, P.H. and S.C. Harris (eds.). Biological nitrogen fixation technology for tropical Agriculture, CIAT, Cali, Columbia pp. 413-425.

Soerjono, R. and Suhaendi, H. 1981. The prospect of Calliandra plantation in Indonesia. Paper presented for discussion concerning Calliandra between National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - USA and Indonesia, held on 14th May 1981

in Jakarta.

Report of World Food and Agriculture Organisation of United Nations, 2015. Socio-economic context and role of agriculture

Published

2020-08-25

How to Cite

KWIZERA Chantal, KABONEKA Salvator, NDIHOKUBWAYO Soter, HABONIMANA Bernadette, NIJIMBERE Severin, & NSENGIYUMVA Prudence. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Different Fertilizers Effects on Maize Growth Parameters. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering (IJASRE), ISSN:2454-8006, 6(8), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.31695/IJASRE.2020.33862

Issue

Section

Articles