Study of Suspended Prosecution (Geschorst) in Geschil Prejudicial Dispute for Criminal and Civil Settlement in Indonesia

Authors

  • Ketut Wira Hadiputra University Of Merdeka Malang Indonesia
  • Setiyono University Of Merdeka Malang Indonesia
  • Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti University Of Merdeka Malang Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31695/IJASRE.2022.8.2.5

Keywords:

Prosecution, Geschorst, Prejudicial Gechil, Criminal Case, Civil case

Abstract

This article aims to examine the regulation of Prejudicial Geschil in investigating criminal cases, which involves a civil law element in the applicable laws and regulations, and the legal consequences of Prejudicial Geschil in criminal cases which involve civil law elements. The method used is a normative legal research method. The results show that Prejudicial rules in examining criminal and civil cases are regulated in the Criminal Code; Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 1 of 1956 concerning the Legal Relations between the Civil Court and the Criminal Court; Law Number 4 of 2004 concerning Judicial Power; Number 6 of 1992 concerning Settlement of Cases in the High Court; Supreme Court Decision Number 413 K/Kr/1980 dated August 26, 1980, and Number 129K/Kr/1979 dated April 16, 1980; and Supreme Court Decision Number 628 K/Pid/1984 dated July 22, 1985. Legal consequences of Prejudicial Geschil in criminal and civil cases where criminal cases are suspended until given verdict in the civil cases. Then the legal implications of Prejudicial Geschil in Police Investigations are that the investigation process is temporarily suspended/pending, as has been regulated in Article 81 of the Criminal Code and the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 1956 concerning the Legal Relations between the Civil Court and the Criminal Court.

References

R. Soesilo, The Criminal Code (KUHP) and its Complete Comments Article by Article, Bogor: Politea, 1994, page 942.

P.A.F. Lamintang, D. Simmons. 1992. Book of Criminal Law Study. Bandung: Pioneer Jaya. page 374

A.F. Lamintang, D. Simmons. 1992. Book of Criminal Law Study. Bandung: Pioneer Jaya. page 372

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Legal Research, Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2008, page 29

J.J. Brugink, Rechtsreflecties, Translated by Arif Sidartha, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1995, pages 213-218

Asep N Mulyana, Deferred Prosecution Agreement in Business Crimes, Jakarta: PT. Grasindo, page 85

E.N. Butarbutar, Wealth Law According to the Systematics of the Civil Code and Its Development, Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2016, page 97

Melisa Ifityanti. 2010. Juridical Analysis of the Authority of Investigators Issuing Orders to Terminate Investigations (SP-3) on Corruption Crimes. Medan: Law Faculty of North Sumatra University

John Thamrun. Prejudicial Disputes. Jakarta: Sinar Graphic. 2016. page 85

Zainal Abidin, 2005. Sentencing, Crime, and Action in the Draft Criminal Code. ELSAM, Jakarta. page 18-1

A. Ridwan Halim, 1982. Criminal Law and Questions and Answers. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, page 31

R. Soeroso. 1993. Introduction to Law. Jakarta: Sinar Graphic. page 269

Downloads

How to Cite

Ketut Wira Hadiputra, Setiyono, & Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti. (2022). Study of Suspended Prosecution (Geschorst) in Geschil Prejudicial Dispute for Criminal and Civil Settlement in Indonesia. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering (IJASRE), ISSN:2454-8006, DOI: 10.31695/IJASRE, 8(2), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.31695/IJASRE.2022.8.2.5

Issue

Section

Articles