Comparative Evaluation of Surface Treatment Effect of AZ91D Alloy Material

Authors

  • Sung-Hyung Lee
  • Hitoshi Yashiro
  • Song-Zhu Kure-Chu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31695/IJASRE.2019.33213

Keywords:

AZ91D Mg alloy, Anodization, Plasma anodization, Non-chromate, Oxide layer

Abstract

Magnesium is chemically reactive, weakly corrosive, weakly abrasion resistant and heat resistant, so various surface treatments
have been developed. Non-chromate, anodizing, and plasma anodizing were selected as the surface treatment methods, and a
comparative study on surface components, oxide thickness, heat diffusivity, dielectric breakdown voltage, hardness, and corrosion resistance was conducted. More specifically, the thermal conductivity is best in the case of non-chromate, and the breakdown voltage and Vickers hardness are highest in the case of plasma anodization. In the salt spray test, the corrosion resistance rating number was 3.5, 7, and 9 for non-chromate, anodization and plasma anodization, respectively

Downloads

How to Cite

Sung-Hyung Lee, Hitoshi Yashiro, & Song-Zhu Kure-Chu. (2019). Comparative Evaluation of Surface Treatment Effect of AZ91D Alloy Material. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering (IJASRE), ISSN:2454-8006, DOI: 10.31695/IJASRE, 5(5), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.31695/IJASRE.2019.33213